Open Journal Systems

A Comparative Study Of Variation Of Foot Arch Index With Body Mass Index Among Young Adults

Rachna Rohatgi, Nirupma Gupta, Kamlesh Khatri

crossmark logo side by side horizontal

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15520/ijmhs.2016.vol6.iss2.109.

Abstract


The foot forms an important support for the body, which  endure high ground reaction forces generated during activities of daily living. The structure and  movements of the foot are crucial for lower limb gait kinematics . The medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot is the primary shock-absorbing structure particularly important for foot function . Increased body mass index (BMI) has been shown to affect the foot arch index. An arch index of less than 0.21 indicates cavus foot while greater than 0.26 is indicative of a planus foot whereas arch index between 0.21 and 0.26 corroborates normal arch height.

The aim of the present study is to correlate the arch index derived from foot print measurement in BMI based normal weight, overweight and obese young adults.

Methodology: The present study was conducted on 60 students of either sex in the age group of 18 to 25 years in the Department of Anatomy, School of medical sciences and research,Sharda University, Greater noida,UP. The standard anthropometric measures of height and weight were taken and BMI was calculated . Based on BMI, the students were divided into normal (19 to 24.9kg/m2), overweight (25 to 29.9kg/m2) and obese (>30kg/m2).Foot prints were taken on a graph paper and arch index was calculated.

Results: The mean arch index in normal, overweight and obese subjects was found to be 0.19±0.028, 0.2±30.043 and 0.26±0.045 respectively. Gender comparison did not reveal any significant difference(p>0.05) in all the three groups.

Conclusion: The results of the study may help in establishing preventive and rehabilitative interventions to improve the quality of life of overweight and obese individuals.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Spyropolous P, Pisciotta JC, Pavlou KN, Cairns MA, Simon SR. Biomechanical gait analysis in obese men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72 (13) : 1065-1070.

Fukano M, Fukubayashi T: Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009; 105:387-392.

Oatis CA, Beattie PF: Kinesiology: The Mechanics and Pathomechanics of Human Movement. 2nd edition. Philidelphia: Lippincott Williams& Wilkins; 2009.

Jahss MH. Disorders of the foot. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia; 1982.

Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, RMc Alexander. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature. 1987; 325:147-149.

Dowling AM, Steele JR. Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children? Int J Obesity.2001; 25:845- 852.

Cavanagah PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: A useful measure from footprint. JBiomech. 1987; 20: 547-51.

Williams DS, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clinical Biomechancis. 2001;16: 341-347.

Urray SR, Wearing SC. A comparison of footprint indices calculated from ink and electronic footprint. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001; 91(4): 203-9.

WHO expert consultation. Appropriate Body Mass Index for Asian population and it’s implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet, 2014;157-163.

Ganu SS, Panhale V. Effect of Obesity on Arch Index in Young Adults. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2012; 11(4):8.Availableat URL:http://www.ojhas.org/issue44/2012-4-8.html

Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Baur LA. Are the feet of obese children fat or flat? Revisiting the debate. Int J Obes. 2011; 35 (1): 115-120.

Wearing SC, Grigg N, Lau CH, Smeathers JE. Footprint based estimates of arch structure are confounded by body composition in adults. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30 (8):1351-1354.

Evans AM. The paediatric flat foot and general anthropometry in 140 Australian school children aged 7-10 years. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 4 (1):12.

Roy H, Bhattacharya K, Deb S, Ray K. Arch index: An easier approach for arch height (A Regression Analysis). Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2012; 5 (2) :137-146.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.